I just received a very nice email from the organizers of a professional conference at which I spoke earlier this year. Here is an excerpt:
Your combined speaker ratings from the onsite and virtual attendee evaluations may be found below.
Please note that our rating scale is: 5 = Exceptional, 4 = Better Than Expectations, 3 = Met Expectations, 2 = Below Expectations, 1 = Unsatisfactory
Session Title: Shut Up and Eat Your French Fries: Asking Effective Questions
- Knowledge of Subject Matter: 4.81
- Presentation Skills: 4.72
- Topic Relevant to My Practice: 4.55
- Usefulness of Materials: 4.48
You may use the following overall Speaker Rating averages as a basis of comparison for your scores:
- Knowledge of Subject Average: 4.71
- Presentation Skills Average: 4.50
- Relevance Average: 4.48
- Materials: 4.29
And, this means…
The good news, it seems, is that “on average” the attendees liked what I had to share. They thought I was a skilled and knowledgeable presenter who had something relevant for them to hear and useful materials.
The bad news, I have no idea if anyone learned anything.
This is a major problem in all professional education. Think back to your days in school and college. Do you remember rating your professors? The comfort of the chairs? Me, either!
When professionals are asked questions during CPE (Continuing Professional Education) sessions online it is only done to make sure they are paying attention. Yeah, THAT shows a high level of trust!
If the professions wish to remain relevant, it is time for them to rethink the way they have implemented CPE.