Decoy Effect Pricing Example

by Ed Kless on September 3, 2010

Sage Business Partner Wayne Schulz of Schulz Consulting posted this great example of using the decoy effect in pricing options from the New York Post on my Facebook page. This is similar to the example Dan Ariely used in his TEDtalk about the Economist. However, in that case, the publisher seemed to believe they had made a mistake and pulled the ad when Ariely questioned them on it.

In this case, I think the Post knows exactly what they are doing. In addition to the dominated option (4 weeks for $9.18), they have also included two anchor products -  $2 for a single issue and $5 for a back issue.

Adding the .18 to the dominated option also gives it an air of precision and simultaneously draws your attention to it. I originally thought this was a bad idea and I wrote Wayne telling him that. I have changed my mind, I think it is brilliant.

I also find it intriguing that they do not list the price per issue of each of the options. Most subscription pricing options provide this. I think not providing it is the smarter idea.

The lesson for professional firms is that you can use the dominated option to influence customers to a higher or lower level (see the decoy effect), but only if you provide options in your proposal. A range of hours from low to high for the same result is not options pricing. In fact, if anything, it is confusing to the customer.

Imagine if instead of a price on an item in a supermarket, they just gave us a range. A loaf of bread would be listed as between $2 – $4. Once you got home from the store (I originally was going to write ‘got to the cashier,’ but that is not accurate), they would send you a final bill indicating that you paid $3.75 for loaf. It sounds crazy, but this is exactly what professionals do when they provide a prospect with a range of hours proposal. It is, in effect, an infinite number of options. It is confusing to the customer.

Don’t do it.! Use options pricing instead.

  • Share/Bookmark

Really! A Patent for Cost-Plus Pricing! Really!

by Ed Kless on August 30, 2010

My friend and Sage business partner Gary Crouch from CS3 Technology in Tulsa, OK sent me this story from the Tulsa Business Journal.

The article details the fact that a local company Fee Technology Inc. has acquired a patent for “a mathematical process for creating a direct relationship between the prices charged to the cost structure of a business.”

Correct me if I am wrong, it is called cost-plus pricing and the patented process is called multiplication.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Most Effective Email Ever

by Ed Kless on August 12, 2010

Today, the most effective email I have ever received arrived in my inbox at 1:13pm CT.

The email was from a co-worker at Sage that I have never met face to face. Amber Kenyon is the senior strategic account manager for partner programs and works out the Richmond, BC office. One of her duties is working on the Simply Accounting partner conference, Simple Partnership at which I am a planned speaker.

It seems there has been decision to obtain special shirts for Sage team members and Amber was charged with obtaining the shirt sizes. Instead of the standard email asking for my size, Amber sent me this instead:

Good Morning Simply Staff,

I am extremely excited to let you know that you have been recognized as members of the staff to attend our Simply Partnership Conference in October. In efforts to ensure that we are organized before the event, I am going to ask you to submit your shirt size to me by tomorrow (Friday, August 13th) to ensure we get the correct size. The shirt will most likely be a golf type shirt to help you imagine yourself in it. If you do not reply by tomorrow I will have to guess and this is what you may end up with.

clip_image001

I will be starting to send out more information in the next couple of weeks in regards to a schedule, presentation tools and other key bits that you will need to ensure that you are ready to go in October so stay tuned…

Have a great day everyone!

Sincerely,
Amber Kenyon
Senior Strategic Account Manager, Partner Programs
Sage
Suite 120 – 13888 Wireless Way
Richmond, BC, V6V 0A3

That, my friends, is an effective email!

I responded with my size, large, in record time. Her email is fun, witty and  has had the desired effect (at least on me) – a quick response.

Kudos Amber!

  • Share/Bookmark

A Fair Price?

by Ed Kless on August 2, 2010

A recent video from reason.tv noted the word fair in English has few direct translations in other languages. This was fascinating to me being a lover of etymologies, but it also got me to thinking about the expression fair price.

Take a look at the video and please comment on your thoughts about what is a fair price to you?

  • Share/Bookmark

Price Options for a Newspaper

by Ed Kless on July 20, 2010

A Sage Partner and friend of mine, Steve Bond from TAG, sent me an example of pricing options he received from the a local paper. The options were as follows and presented in this exact order:

  • 1 Year Online & Print Subscription $149.00
  • 2 Year Online & Print Subscription $385.39
  • 6 Months Online & Print Subscription $148.34
  • 3 Months Online & Print Subscription $83.74

Two questions: 1) Do you think this was intentional or just haphazard? Why or why not? and 2) Which option would you have chosen?

Note: This post has been altered from its original per a request.

  • Share/Bookmark

Building the Knowledge Worker Organization

by Ed Kless on July 7, 2010

Today, I welcome a guest post from Gary Crouch of CS3 Technology in Tulsa, OK. He wrote this article in the wake of the Firm of the Future session at Insights 2010.

Gary’s thoughts are flashes of brilliance and will take some effort to embrace and even more effort to fully understand and implement. His most profound insight is, “My function then as the leader of a team of knowledge workers is to attract intellectual capital to my team.”

Thanks, Gary for allowing me to post this.

Leader: someone who guides or directs others

Team: a number of people organized to function cooperatively as a group

Sometime back I read a book or article describing how the knowledge worker can and should maximize their own potential by playing the part of the hired gun (unfortunately I cannot locate the article to give credit where credit is due). For the knowledge worker, the author explained, it is in their best interest to manage their career path by hiring out to the highest bidder at every opportunistic step. This could be accomplished by promotions within the current organization or moving through various organizations that have an increasingly higher need for his/her services. Either way, the number one priority is to promote their skills and experience to the marketplace.

As I have personally benefited from implementing many ideas shared by Ed Kless in my business, I attend as many of his speaking sessions as possible. At Insights 2010, I heard Ed describe our employees as knowledge workers, our most important assets, who walk out of our doors each evening. As I had heard this before, my tendency was to get depressed thinking about just how fragile the culmination of my life’s work, our business, really has become. Then, a thought occurred to me and everything came into focus.

Earlier in the day, we reviewed the building blocks for a successful knowledge worker firm as the following formula:

Profits = Capital Management * Effectiveness * Pricing on Purpose

My thoughts focused on the capital management element of the equation. Capital is made up of various resources that the knowledge firm must manage on a continual basis. These resources include the following:

Financial Capital = Operating capital and cash flow

Intellectual Capital = The ability to maintain and grow knowledge within an organization such that it can be applied to solve customer problems

Structural Capital = The environmental components that allow an organization to function effectively such as processes, systems, methodologies, physical plant, communications facilities

Social Capital = The brand of the organization that includes relationships with vendors, customers, external influencers, product and service awareness, and so forth

It dawned on me; in many cases the ability of the knowledge worker to monetize their intellectual capital is limited. Most knowledge workers need to work within an organization for various forms of capital that they either do not possess, or do not have the ability to properly manage. For instance, they may not possess the cash flow for marketing themselves or for investing in new equipment; they may not be able to build systems to manage projects, bill their services, perform Q&A functions while chasing the next job; they may be great technical resources, but not know how to approach social networking effectively so they have a new project waiting for them when their current project is completed. These limitations of the hired gun are answered by participating in a team environment. When the knowledge worker’s specific expertise is combined with varying forms of expertise brought by other knowledge workers and multiple capital resources, only then does the application of intellectual capital bring value to the buyer.

My function then as the leader of a team of knowledge workers is to attract intellectual capital to my team. I can do this by providing the benefits of various forms of capital that the intellectual capital owner does not possess or does not have the ability to manage. If my team is effective to the point of profitability, then I am able to demonstrate the ability to monetize the knowledge worker’s intellectual capital.

Of course, money is not everything. If I also can help the knowledge worker grow in experience, knowledge and capital management abilities, then I have provided value beyond money. As long as the knowledge worker remains with the team, I also have built additional intellectual capital accessible to my team.

To be sure, the process will always be fluid. As the team gains additional experience and knowledge individually, we must recognize the additional value requiring either additional compensation or opportunities to grow. However, the combined growth inherent in the team provides even more reason for the team to remain intact.

Should a member of the organization find a more beneficial team for their situation, then the process begins again and is costly. However, the relationship has been mutually beneficial. Both the team and the organization have been profitable. In addition, intellectual capital is one form of capital that can be shared. When a knowledge worker shares his knowledge with a customer or a coworker, they do not diminish their own knowledge. In fact, through an exchange of ideas, the knowledge worker’s intellectual capital will grow as well. Concurrently, if our organization’s capital management process includes cross training the team members, the team can retain the exiting knowledge worker’s intellectual capital even as the knowledge worker leaves the team.

Through the process, the organization has gained in reputation, customers, reference sources, finances, experience and any number of other resources. The departing knowledge worker may also add to our social capital as an external influencer or even by bringing the new employer organization to our team as a customer.

Business is the process of providing solutions for others. As we continue to build our organizations, we must recognize the impact of the knowledge worker on our business models. As we provide a valuable package of organizational attributes that the knowledge worker can monetize their intellectual capital, we can help them grow. At the same time, we can increase our retained resources of financial, structural and social capital.

All in all, it is not a zero-sum game; everybody can win.

  • Share/Bookmark

Proposed Firm of the Future Symposium

June 22, 2010

Based on the success of the session at Insights on the same topic, we (Sage) are looking at delivering a Firm of the Future Symposium in Dallas on August 23-24. This experience is dedicated to the possibility that a professional organization can be run more effectively when it becomes a knowledge firm rather than a [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
Read the full article →

What I Believe Redux

June 21, 2010

Two weeks ago, in a post entitled, What I Believe, I put forward a declaration. It went thusly: I believe in challenging the status quo. The way I challenge the status quo is helping professionals change their business model from a focus on service to a focus on knowledge. It happens to be a better [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
Read the full article →

Firm of the Future Insights Session

June 21, 2010

For those of you who are so inclined (probably only my Mom), I present for your viewing pleasure the video feed from the dialogue session I did at Insights entitled Creating the Firm of the Future. Here is the session description: This session will be dedicated to the possibility that a professional organization can be [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
Read the full article →

Seth Godin Is Wrong

June 18, 2010

I have read most of Seth Godin’s books and am an occasionally reader of his blog. On June 9, 2010, in a post entitled Hourly work vs. linchpin work, he wrote the following: You should pay people by the hour when there are available substitutes. When you rely on freelancers you can put a value [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
Read the full article →